Andrew chats with Robin Tilbrook Chairman of The English Democrats, about his assertion and his court case that claims that we have already left the EU on the 29th March 2019. Why? Find out during this interview.Continue reading
LET EVERYONE KNOW ABOUT THIS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE.
An Act to confer power on the Prime Minister to notify, under Article 50(2) of the Treaty on European Union, the United Kingdom’s intention to withdraw from the EU. [16th March 2017]
BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—
1 Power to notify withdrawal from the EU
(1) The Prime Minister may notify, under Article 50
(2) of the Treaty on European Union, the United Kingdom’s intention to withdraw from the EU. (2) This section has effect despite any provision made by or under the European Communities Act 1972 or [any other enactment].
2 Short title
This Act may be cited as the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017.
People I really need your help on this by getting this into the face of every news outlet.
Robin Tilbrook’s Facebook account was taken down (disabled) when he published the full 137 words of this law! (In text form as above ) i.e
They do not want the text version and nub of the case – This Law – all over the internet!
European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017.
Why is it significant?
The presiding Judge in our case omitted this from his ruling in its entirety! In my view he did this on purpose to mislead people into thinking our case was in his words “The nub of the claim” other acts, without referring to the “real” nub of the claim “European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017” This is NOT a minor omission.
There is a reason for it!
We are right! He could not disagree and therefore chose not to rule on it or mention it! HE CHOSE TO REFUSE OUR JUDICIAL REVIEW TO STOP THIS BEING AIRED IN OPEN COURT. The same as MSM and Parliament! A pattern is emerging! The picture is like a Meme. It cannot be censored. The text can. It is the text they are worried about!
This act is so “specific” in it’s wording in LAW (it does not imply, it is specific).
There is NOTHING complex about this at all.
1. It only confers power by parliament to issue the notice (not withdraw or extend it).
2. Once notice is given the clocks ticking (two years max OUT, OUT)
3. It specifically repeals (in spite of) the European Communities Act 1972.
4. “any other enactment” The last limb of this simple Law says “no other law,” which means no statutory instrument, no motion, no other law! can alter this act.
The act has full force of “Constitutional Law” as it was elevated and caused by three things
1. A Common Law ruling in the Gina Miller case
2. Common Law ruling in the Metric Martyrs Case
3. The 2nd Referendum. Thats it. No if’s No But’s. Your BEING CONNED like in the 1970’s by the same establishment, same play book, Different actors!
Look at the ruling from this Judge. Not a single mention of “European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017. This simple 137 word law. Not a single ref. It mentions all of the other acts except this “crucial one”. This is deliberate! Why? We are OUT!
What happens to society when people who are presenting facts are bullied into silence? Canadian MP Lisa Raitt retweeted a Financial Post article written by
In this video Tony Heller document how the New York Times is rewriting their own climate history, and making claims which are the exact opposite of reality – as well as the opposite of their own past reporting.
This week I was rather rudely attacked as a Trump supporter and told…
“you supported Trump who said he’d grab a woman if he wanted”
So am I a Trump supporter?
I have…. well no standing in this matter really, I can not vote for Trump or for anyone else who may be standing for the presidency of the USA. However, if I had a vote in the 2016 presidential election, I would have voted for Trump.
So doesn’t that make me a Trump supporter?
No, it just makes me more against Hillary Clinton that Donald Trump.
The fact that I would have voted for Trump does not in any way suggest that I believe him to be a; great guy or a good man or even a good chose for the presidency. But if you are given the chose of a bad man for the presidency or a, (in my opinion), really wicked woman… Trump it is.
And as for his mistreatment of women. As Trump might say, “not good.” But the women that I have heard about Trump mistreating, were to one extent to the other also playing the sexually liberated game form the flirty to the porn start. I believe if the could have found more innocent women that he mistreated they would have had them all over the Main Stream Media.
Hillary, (in my opinion), is married to a serial woman abuser and is according to information that I have heard also a serial sexual abuser of women.
She is given to violent temper tantrums, and while Bill was in the white house would often through objects about the place, even at security staff. There are many who also believe that she is a practising witch.
She has a considerable history of lying about her time in office and with Obama would make light of the deaths that they had been responsible for.
“We came, we saw, he died”Hillary Clinton on Gaddafi
She calmed that she landed under sniper fire in Bosnia to big herself up, but in fact, it was a peaceful landing.
She sold uraniums to the Russians.
On top of this, I believe that she is a warmonger. and more not to mention all the Arkancideds that happen when the Clintons area around, (Arkancide is the unfortunate habit of potential witnesses to the Clintons’ dirty dealings in Arkansas suddenly deciding to shoot themselves twice in the back of the head).
There is much more that could be said, but given the choice of Trump or Clinton, Trump was not the best choice but was at least the least worse.
I have included some videos you might like to see below.
Would I vote for him in 2020?
Almost for certain not.
In 2016, Trump was the least worst out of himself and Hillary. He appeared, and I believe was on the whole, independent of the establishment, (the deep state), he was full of good intentions to stop uncontrolled immigration, and to protect the freedom, in fact to return some of the stolen freedom of the church to speak out on matter of morality and politics.
Today, Trump appears to have been turned by the powers of the deep state. He is now moving towards the promotion of LGBT rights to the point where even the church will be forced to marry people of the same sex. And he appears to have sold out to the very strong Zionist powers that hold so much power in the corridors of government in the USA.
Now it is still possible that Trump may be the least worse choice in the 2020 elections… but he now appears to be too dangerous to vote for even if that means that you just can not vote.
I am not a Trump supporter, I never have been. My allegiance is the God, his revealed word the Bible and to
A nearly year-old video depicting abortion mill workers playing with the remains of murdered unborn children is going viral once again.
LifeSiteNews re-released the video this week, and the video is making its rounds on social media sites in a big way. It shows two men in white lab coats who appear to be playing with the bodies of aborted children like they’re toys or dolls.
The sick game being played by these so-called “healthcare workers” shows their absolute disregard for the most vulnerable of human lives. The video first emerged on a Venezuelan Facebook page last July and collected nearly 10 million views. It’s not clear when or where it was recorded, nor are the identities of the men in the video.