European Nuclear Button

The European Union wants the Nuclear Button

We have spoken about this before, now it is in the New York Times.

They say, “Eurocrats are considering obtaining nuclear weapons as they feel they can no longer rely on protection from America. Support for the proposal seems to come mainly from the Germans.”

Automatic translation.

Jaroslaw Kaczynski, (The chairman of the Polish PiS party), thinks loudly about the nuclear rearmament of the European Union. The chairman of the national conservative Polish government “Law and Justice” (PiS), in conversation with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , welcomed the idea of an atomic “supermarket” Europe. [1. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/polen-kaczynski-macht-werbung-fuer-angela-merkel-14859897.html.] [translated from German]

The plan would apparently see the European Union acquiring the nuclear weapons of France and even Britain.  Unless through Brexit, we can put a stop to them getting the UK weapons.

Even if Brexit means that we manage to maintain control of the UK’s nuclear weapons, it appears Germany is intent on gaining control of France’s nuclear arsenal. Who knows, it is just possible with the way that the mood is shifting in France, that they could end up in frexit before this happens.

It is reported that Roderich Kiesewetter, a German foreign policy spokesman told a German newspaper: “My idea is to build on the existing weapons in Great Britain and France.”

Kiesewetter’s plan would see the EU take control of France’s nukes, finance them with German money and force other European member states to store warheads in their countries.

Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear WeaponsUnder Article, I of the NPT, nuclear-weapon states pledge, “not to transfer nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices to any recipient or in any way assist, encourage or induce any non-nuclear-weapon state in the manufacture or acquisition of a nuclear weapon.”

If the EU is planning on taking control of Frances nuclear weapons, this appears to be a clear breach on Frances side of Article I of the NPT, (Non-Proliferation Treaty).

Article II, says that “non-nuclear-weapon states pledge not to acquire or exercise control over nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices and not to seek or receive assistance in the manufacture of such devices.”

So, Germany and all the other non-nuclear EU countries are also going to be in violation of Article II or the NPT.

The USA has some nuclear warheads in Europe but under US control. It is speculated that the number of warheads in Europe could fall if America withdraws some or all of its weapons.  “It’s not a question of numbers (of nuclear warheads),” Mr. Kiesewetter said. “The reassurance and deterrence comes from the existence of the weapons and their deployability.” In other words, at least some of the Germans are rather unhappy that they can not independently fire the nuclear weapons that are in Europe.

Angela Merkel has denied such a plan exists, but it is undeniably being discussed at the highest levels of government across Europe. Hungary and Poland voiced their support of such a plan shortly after Kiesewetter gave his interview.

Most chilling of all is the fact that Kiesewetter said: “These are political weapons. Their use must be unpredictable”. Given how eurocrats have denied there were plans for an EU army, talk of them now obtaining a ‘political weapon’ should send shivers down every European’s spine.

The strong desire, of some German politicians, and some eurocrats from other EU countries, to get their hands on not only nuclear weapons but their desire to have their hand on the nuclear button should be very troubling to us. Especially with the way that NATO countries appear to be doing their very best to antagonise Russia. You could almost believe that some of them are itching for a way. [Do they need something to cover up the coming economic collapse and to hide the fact that they have been bleeding their own citizens dry? This is for another article]

The church should bring this before the Lord, seeking his hand of care and protaction over this matter.

Toronto

Trouble brewing for Christians in Ontario

While quite likely motivated by good will, this unfortunately worded motion raises a series of concerns.

The motion brought forward by Liberal MPP Nathalie Des Rosiers condemns “all forms of Islamophobia” while never defining the term. As we have just seen in the UK, laws that are passed with good intentions can very quickly be turned to mischief.

Failure to define the term, “Islamophobia,” opens the door to its abuse, whether willfully or unintentionally. We have just seen a law outlawing hate is now being used to forbid the preaching of the Gospel or the public reading of the Bible. See Quoting the King James Bible is “abusive and a criminal matter”.

The term “Islamophobia” like “homophobia,” will be weaponised to silence opponents of Islam, just as homophobia has been to silence opponents of gay marriage or Christians who adhere to biblical morality.

The full text of the Ontario motion follows:

That, in the opinion of this House, the Legislative Assembly of Ontario should reaffirm that diversity has always played an important part in Ontario’s culture and heritage; recognize the significant contributions Muslims have made, and continue to make, to Ontario’s cultural and social fabric and prosperity; stand against all forms of hatred, hostility, prejudice, racism and intolerance; rebuke the notable growing tide of anti-Muslim rhetoric and sentiments; denounce hate-attacks, threats of violence and hate crimes against people of the Muslim faith; condemn all forms of Islamophobia and reaffirm its support for government’s efforts, through the Anti-Racism Directorate, to address and prevent systemic racism across government policy, programs and services, and increase anti-racism education and awareness, including Islamophobia, in all parts of the province.

Mobile World Congress 2017

The coming Global Brain!

What your media have NOT told you about Mobile World Congress 2017.

Just take the BBC for example. This evening their home page’s main news was, “Republicans baulk at Trump’s budget plan.” Big news for the UK? Probably not. If you go to the tech section of the BBC website the main news is, “Amazon fault knocks websites offline.” Perhaps slightly more important if you have been struggling with connecting with Quora, a Q&A forum, or Trello, the productivity app. But not world changing.

So let us head right down to the Mobile World Congress news. What was that about? 5G and just that is is faster and 4G and that it can handle a lot of data from you smart car or smart home. Others are talking about new phones or virtual reality and even the internet of things, Being able to control your lights, cooker heating from anywhere in the world, etc.

However, this is not the guts of what was being discussed at the Mobile World Congress this year.

Main Themes

My friend who is at the Mobile World Congress 2017 reports that the main themes of the congress are: Artificial intelligence, the Global Brain, Smart Cities, Ubiquitous Connectivity, and United Nations Agenda 2030.

You have not heard much about that on the BBC, have you?

The Global Agenda

Mats Granryd is the director general of GSMA, (GSMA is the trade body that represents the interests of mobile operators worldwide. Approximately 800 mobile operators are full GSMA members, and a further 300 companies in the broader mobile ecosystem are associate members). In his opening remarks, Mats Granryd said that, and I am paraphrasing, this is from a verbal report, I was not there, but he said something like this, ‘The GSMA market is the first market segment in the world that is fully committed to implementing the UN Agenda 2030 and their sustainable development goals.’

Apparently, the UN’s Agenda 2030 is woven through everything that is being discussed at the Mobile World Congress this year.

At this conference, people have been talking about a global nervous system, artificial intelligence. My friend went to this event to get up to speed on what is happening in the mobile world so his ministry can make sure they are broadcasting in the best medium for today’s listeners. But what he got was a wake-up call from God. Top technologists are talking about a Global Brain, and not in the abstract, but coming soon. Practically every session was to one extent or another talking about or contributing to the discussion on the idea of a global brain.

It appears to be that the mobile industry is going to be the backbone of the global brain or universal intelligence that is being built at this very moment.

5G

The world is rapidly moving towards 5G, and it is anticipated that this will start around 2020. When you see 5G rolling out that is a good sign that the global brain is also being put into place.  5G is not just a bonus to your connectivity, but an essential part of this worldwide intelligence.

GSMA are committed to the UN agenda 2030, and this may give us a clue re the timing in this area. It appears that effectively the entire infrastructure if the mobile phone system is going to be replaced over the next decade or so. A compleat rebuild of the planets communications infrastructure, and Mobile being at the centre. The intention is to bring about ubiquitous connectivity. It may sound good to be always ‘connected’, but it will, in effect, end up putting us into an open prison. There will be nowhere, at least not in the western world, where you will not be on their radar.

An inescapable intelligent network

The suggestion is that everything, everything will be connected, will be smart. The statement was made, “Your shoes will be more intelligent that you are!”

Much, if not most of this connectivity will be through low orbiting satellites, therefore, even when you think that you will be, away from this connectivity if you can just get to… you will still be under these satellites.

It was also put forward that there will be a very a great many drones flying automate all over the place.

César Alierta, Chief Executive ofTelefónica of Spain apparently talked about putting a brain in the network. He went on, (remembered quite not word for word), “Where the telephone started was fixed voice, then it progressed to mobile voice, and then it progressed to data gigabytes, the next evolution is cognitive intelligence.”

Telefónica already has a brain that can talk, listen and think. They call it AURA.

Read Hastings the founder of Netflix, was asked where do you see us x number of years from now? His reply was, “We may be entertaining artificial intelligence.”

Softbank Chairman Masayoshi Son, spoke about the idea of the singularity that is that computer brains will surpass human brains. He gave the figures that the average person has an IQ of 100, but computer chip on an artificial brain will have an IQ of 10,000. Mr Son anticipates that computers will surpass the human brain in 2018.

What is being proposed, appears to be a global feudal system, enforced by technology, run by a small number of very wealthy technocrats.

The fourth industrial revolution.

They see the need to remake society. A new society is needed in which few humans will be needed because robots will be able to fulfil most tasks.

A common phrase that was used to this is the fourth industrial revolution.

Your place in this network will be authenticated by universal biometric scanning, not only of your eye and fingers but of the way you walk, the blood vessels in your face and more. If you are not prepared to participate in this new world, if you are not biometrically embedded into this system, you will not be able to even open the door of a car, or you house.

All this and more coming to a mobile phone and a cell tower near you in the next few years or dacades.

Much of this reporting comes from the news network TruNews.

gender neutral toilet sign

Trump rescinds trans bathroom rules from Obama

Donald Trump’s government has revoked guidance to US public schools that allowed transgender students to use toilets matching their gender identity. This seems to be just common sense. Instead of the government forcing every school in the USA to let boys use the girl’s toilets and showers, the government is leaving this to the individual states. If then the states leave it to each school, we would then be able to see just how many people wish to put their son or daughter in a school where… Well, we will look at what could happen in a minute.

Last May, (May 2016) Mr Obama’s administration instructed public schools, (at the threat of the total loss of funding), to allow transgender students to use whichever bathroom and showers corresponded to their gender identity. Moreover, it seems that just saying that you feel like a boy or a girl is sufficient an act to let you use the facilities of your choice. Anyone staff or student who challenges this will be held guilty of transphobia or the like.

Man in woman's toiletIn a cursory reading, this could sound quite innocent. It is just an instruction and, it is only to allow children to choose what toilet to use. However, it is actually, a HUGE change in the way society has thought about the treatment of the different sexes and how men and women should interact with each other in… toilets. Moreover, it probably puts a large number of children at risk of harm. Yes, there may be a few who are struggling or even enjoying being transgender, and accommodation may need to be made for them. However, this should not be at the risk of putting hormonal boys or men in the same toilet as our, girls and wives.

let me first consider some of the more obvious problems that could arise.

In junior schools, you have young children who have little experience or wisdom to protect them from the foolishness that is being put in front of them. In some areas of England children as young as 4 or 5 are being asked to chose what sex they feel like? Children, should be allowed to be children without having to face the question, are you a boy or a girl today?

In senior school, you have a large number of pre-pubescent and pubescent teenagers with hormones raging. For example, set before a teenage boy the decision, do you want to shower wit the girls or the boys? Some are going to think; I might just say I am a girl today if it means they can shower with a class full of teenage girls.

A young girl may find herself in the toilets when a sexually confused teenage boy comes in… just how safe are you going to feel? Just how safe will she be?

This policy is about state-funded schools, but the same policy, but applied more widely has already lead to a swimming pool haveing trouble with a man, repeatedly trying to go into the girls changing rooms. Rules like this always get pushed, and we need to keep out children, wives and grandmothers safe.

A man twice entered the changing room of a swimming pool and began disrobing, once in front of a young girls’ swim team, saying transgender policies gave him the right to do so. The unidentified man entered Evans pool in Seattle near Green Lake last Monday, (8th February 2016), and began taking off his shirt in front of female patrons. [1. ifesitenews.]

If you are saying to yourself, Drapper you are just taking this too far, remember, in 1967 we were told that, abortion would only be in allowed in exceptional circumstances. In 2015 in England and Wales there were 185,824 abortions, (38% were repeat abortions). That is something like; one child killed every three minutes. If trans bathrooms become the norm, it will be pushed to extremes at times.

Thank you, Donald Trump, for bringing common sense to politics again.

Two years in prison for French pro-life websites

The French National Assembly has passed a law making pro-life websites virtually illegal.

Any website judged to be seeking to dissuade women from killing their unborn children could attract a two years prison sentence and a fine of £26,517. This applies to any website judged to in “any manner” be “spreading or transmitting allegations or indications liable to intentionally mislead, with the purpose of deterring (from abortion), on the characteristics or medical consequences of a voluntary interruption of abortion.”

French pro-life campaigners are comparing the decision with the totalitarian pro-abortion regime of communist China.

Pray for our brothers and sisters in France.

 

France image

America spying on France

WikiLeaks has recently released classified CIA espionage orders revealing that for an alleged seven-month period the USA was spying on all the major French political parties during the 2012 French presidential elections.

The documents show that all of France’s major political parties were targeted for infiltration by the CIA’s human and electronic spies.

Not only do the document show that the USA was spying on France, but also that they were seeking to gain, “influence and implement political decisions.”

Part of the documents.

From page four.

This is not in its self that surprising, I expect that most developed countries are seeking continuous intelligence on other major countries current and possible governments, or spying on them. The thing that is surprising about this is the fact the USA have been going overboard trying to implicate Russa in influencing the USA presidential elections for which so far NO evidence has been made public, but here we see that the same intelligence agencies that are accusing Russa are themselves doing the same.

One might be tempted to call, Hypocrisy!”

It is not because we are racist.

A recent survey by The Royal Institute of International Affairs, (commonly known as Chatham House), Asked more than 10,000 people from 10 European states, to what extent did they agree or disagree with this statement, ‘All further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped.’

The results of the survey suggest that UKIP, Trump and many of the conservative, national parties throughout Europe, are more in line with the views of their populations that the liberal media would like you to believe. These views are not extremist, but the norm.

The results show that across all ten of the European countries an average of 55% agreed that all further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped.

25% neither agreed nor disagreed and 20% disagreed but on average 55% were opposed to more immigration from Muslim majority countries.

Majorities in all but two of the ten states agreed, ranging from 71% in Poland, 65% in Austria, 53% in Germany and 51% in Italy to 47% in the United Kingdom and 41% in Spain. In no country did the percentage that disagreed surpass 32%.

Chatham House Survey Results.

Chatham House.

For several reasons I do not believe that this is because we are racist.

First, Islam is not a race. Nor is Islam really a religion either, or at least not just a religion. Islam is a total system of life and contains within itself a particular social system, judicial system, and political system which includes geo-political aspirations – the conquest and administration of territory. Islam is a  political ideology with the goal of taking over the world. Very often a violent political ideology.

This ideology is incompatible with Christianity, Liberal Western Democracy, and our European legal system. Despite what we are often told, and despite the use that Islam makes of democracy and our courts, Islam teaches that Western laws and Western democracy is from man and is not acceptable. The only law that Islam recognises is Sharia, and the only form of government is an Islamic theocracy.

This is not to say that many, many Muslims are not nice people. They are. They are hospitable, nice, law abiding citizens. But Islam requires that a country be moved from liberal western democracy to an Islamic theocracy, with Sharia as its law.

Even in European countries where Islam is a minority, the thin end of the wedge of Sharia is firmly being put into place with many Sharia courts hearing cases each week.

It is not that the people of Europe are racist, it is that Europeans do not want to live under the religious dictatorship of Islamic mullers enforcing Sharia law upon us.

A few examples of laws under Sharia:

  • Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand.
  • Criticising or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
  • Criticising Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
  • Criticising or denying Allah, the god of Islam is punishable by death.
  • A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
  • A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
  • A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
  • A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.

Secondly, as a Christian, I do not believe that we have different races.

“[God] hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth,” (Acts 17:26)

We are all members of the human race. We are different nations, but one race.

It is possible that we are ethnocentric, but why is that a sin? If I want to be with people who live by the standards that I live by, who have similar values, that does not make me evil. Just human.

Nor are Europeans or Americans evil if they do not want to live under Islam or Sharia. There is not one Muslim majority country that I want to move to. You may be ok living there as a protected western worker or a diplomat or the like, but to live there as a Christian, or a woman. No thanks.

Demographic challenge facing Europe.

Professor David Coleman, Emeritus Professor of Demography; Associate Fellow, Department of Social Policy and Intervention at the University of Oxford predicts that:-

  • Foreigners and non-white Britons living in the UK are expected to make up a quarter of the UK population by 2025
  • Foreigners and non-white Britons living in the UK will double by 2040 and reaching one-third of the UK population.
  • White Britons ‘will be in minority by 2066.

People who are worried about this are not filled with hate, they are filled with concern.