I am sitting at work just having a coffee break and popped the news on… Trump and his comments on Charlottesville are still the top item on the BBC TV news.
There is much that we need to look at, and we might this week on the podcast, about Jason Kessler who is the apparent leader of the “White Supremacist group Unite the Right, and the fact that until very recently he was a DNC supporter and was very pro-Barak Obama and is now apparently a white supremacist? Many people as suspecting that the whole event was staged, not the car and the killing, but the drumming up of a rightwing riot. Why there an effective stand down by the police?
But leaving all of this aside. If it was a genuine right wing protest and even if there was intimidation or even violence. Why are we letting our news reports be spun to pin the blame for this on Trump, and why, with North Korea, Siria, The South China Sea and so many, many important world political events happening now, is a small protest in Charlottesville the lead in the news.
Again the news is being set for us by the left-wing liberal extremists, seeking to bring down the Trump administration.
It appears from many, many reports that I am receiving, that anything other then pro-liberal, Pro-leftwing anti-Trump views are being sanitised or de-monetised from Youtube.
I am not suggesting that you should necessarily support the Rebel, but their report (below) is quite typical of many reports that I am receiving.
So the first round of the French Presidential elections has come and gone, and round 2 will be between Macron and Le Pen, on 7 May 2017.
One of the odd things that I noticed was that Marine Le Pen is described as the far right wing candidate, while Emmanuel Macron is the Centrist candidate.
However, Emmanuel Macron has certainly a background that is socialist, and socialism is not centrist at all. Well, it did not use to be until newspeak go involved and all the old nomenclature became changed and made new.
Yes, I can understand that you might call Marine Le Pen right wing, though she is far nearer the centre than say, her father would have been. They are probably really nearer centre left and centre right than far right and centre candidates.
Another way that they have been divided or classed is nationalist vs… well, internationalist or EU supporter, but Emmanuel Macron is much more a globalist or a one world candidate. In this regard, it is interesting to note his background in Banking. Marcron has worked as an investment banker for Rothschild & Cie Banque and as such in very likely to see things from the globalist banking world perspective of the New World Order.
So France is in a battle between a big banking, globalist leftwing pro-EU candidate and a nationalist, anti-globalism and antiEU candidate. We have an interesting few weeks ahead.
This week the world has been outraged and rightly so at a chemical attack on children.
(At times like this the world calls them innocent children, though any parent or theologian knows that there is evil lurking there in their hearts. This is just me being a pedant, to all intense they are innocent in that they do not deserve us to kill hem horribly with burning chemicals.)
I am not really sure that chemical attacks on an adult are much less bad, I do not want to die while choking up me bleeding lungs. But let’s assume that killing babies by burning them with chemicals is bad.
Here in the UK and widely across the world, we regularly and legally kill babies with chemicals every day. If this was brought to your attention on the BBC or on CNN and if there where videos of the suffering children there would be an outcry. But these babies are poisoned and killed in what should be the safest place on earth. Within the mother’s womb.
If this was brought to your attention on the BBC or on CNN and if there where videos of the suffering children there would be an outcry. But these babies are poisoned and killed in what should be the safest place on earth. Within the mother’s womb. So no oxygen masks, no rushing them to the hospital in the arms of their parents, No crying – at least no crying that you can hear. Just an agonising death in the dark. Eyes, and lungs and skin burning, and no relief. No one here will wash your skin or eyes with fresh water.
Most abortion actually involves the baby being dismembered by a powerful suction tube with a sharp cutting edge is inserted into the womb through the dilated cervix. Then the blood, amniotic fluid, placental tissue, and baby body parts are sucked into a collection bottle. Others are starved by chemicals that stop the mother feeding the child.
However, many children are being killed by saline amniocentesis. This technique is used after 16 weeks of pregnancy when enough fluid has accumulated in the amniotic fluid sac surrounding the baby.
A needle is inserted through the mother’s abdomen and 50-250 ml (as much as a cup) of amniotic fluid is withdrawn and replaced with a solution of concentrated salt. The baby breathes in, swallowing the salt, and is poisoned. The chemical solution also causes painful burning and deterioration of the baby’s skin. Usually, after about an hour, the child dies. The mother goes into labour about 33 to 35 hours after installation and delivers a dead, burned, and shrivelled baby. About 97% of mothers deliver their dead babies within 72 hours.
Killing children in a chemical attack is just wrong. Whether in Syria or the womb.
If you have killed your baby, and are now feeling bad, there is an answer. There is forgiveness in Jesus. Contact me for a copy of Finding Gid’s Way.
One of the best Pro-life speeches EVER! Gianna Jessen abortion survivor.
I am VERY concerned!
It appears that “they” have succeeded in turning Trump, and have all but succeded in plunging the world into war. If not war, the takedown of Assad and a VERY heightened risk of war with Russia.
The gas attack before this most recent attack, the Ghouta chemical/gas attack of 2013, was a ‘false flag’ intended to give Barak Obama a reason to invade Syria.
Seymour Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libya’s Sarin to Syrian Rebels. The great investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, in two previous articles in the London Review of Books («Whose Sarin?» and «The Red Line and the Rat Line») has reported that the Obama Administration falsely blamed the government of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad for the sarin gas attack that Obama was trying to use as an excuse to invade Syria; and Hersh pointed to a report from British intelligence saying that the sarin that was used didn’t come from Assad’s stockpiles. Hersh also said that a secret agreement in 2012 was reached between the Obama Administration and the leaders of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, to set up a sarin gas attack and blame it on Assad so that the US could invade and overthrow Assad. «By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria». from Strategic-Culture.org
If you want more on this see this YouTube video.
It was only the fact that the Russians said, over our dead bodies are you going to depose Assad and take Syria that they backed down.
The gas attack this week.
Almost without a doubt, this last gas attack was also… not Assad. Why would he get up in the morning and say, “Hey, the world is coming to terms with me leading Syria, I better prove to them I am a mad man and get them to attack me and probably kill me.” It just does not make sense.
I do not yet have independent evidence to say if it was the Assad’s attack on a weapons store that released rebel gas, or if it was a CIA or the like who released the gas after the attack to provide the excuse for an invasion. Either way, they will not let this opportunity to take control of Syria go without an all out effort to depose Assad and carve up Syria.
Either way, most, of not all of my analyst friends believe that it was not Assad.
In the recent gas attack, a few dozens of people died. They died horribly and it is an utter tragedy. A wicked crime. But before we kill Assad and many tens of thousands of his troops and civilians in an attack on Syria. You must be sure that it is just.
First, ask yourself some questions.
- Do we yet KNOW it was Assad? (NO – even the left-leaning establishment media is still talking about the alleged attack by Assad). That will not stop people blaming Assad, nor the UN taking action against him.
- Who is ultimately responsible for the war in which this ‘attack’ is just one event?
- Assad is the 19th and current President of Syria. Legitimate President even if we do not like him.
- His country is under attack. He is defending it.
- There are military operations in his country, and against the legitimate government from many many nations. Including Israel, America, and the UK. Though the majority of the fighters are non-Syrian radical Muslims supported by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar.
- This war is in Assad’s country and against his government. He is not attacking other countries, he is defending his.
- The rebel fighters are hiding in amongst the civilian population so that it is very hard to fight them without killing civilians. I think this is actually a war crime is it not? No outcry about that. No, “We must stop these evil war criminal rebels,” because they are serving our agenda.
- Another question you could try is, “why are the almost 1,000 civilian non-combatant deaths across Iraq and Syria in March by coalition forces ok, but these few dozens are a war crime?” see the Independent article here.
I am by no means saying that Assad is a good man or even that he should be the president of Syria. But that to blame him for defending his country is a bit off.
Remove the rebel fighters for a year. Remove sanctions and help the country to rebuild and then see if he is still killing people.
Trump now talking about getting involved in Syria.
Now it appears that they have managed to force Trump’s hand into taking action against Assad.
I do not know if it is from the continuous illegal surveillance of Trump and some dirt they have threatened him with, or whether he has been hoodwinked into believing that it truly was Assad. But we can certainly see that using the ‘Bad Russia,’ ‘fake news,’ about Russia hacking the USelectionss, they have left no room for Trump to be seen as soft or friendly towards the Russia supported Assad regime.
Russia stopped the slaughter known as the Arab Spring, it looks like the elite are doing everything they can do to get it going again.
We could also talk about the huge NATO buildup on the border or Russia, but for now, I do not have time to get into this.