TRPR 164 – News Review 30 December 2019.

Andrew gives his take on the news of the week that the church should be taking note of, including, Free speech means freedom to offend, press watchdog insists, Islamist extremists, hold Sharia trials and groom young Muslims in British prisons, The abortion lobby’s next move. The UN suppressed a report on Assad gas attack, Review of Christmas messages, And a Governmental major data breach.

Show notes

Continue reading

Russia: US Plans to Use Fake Chemical Weapons Attack to Strike Syria

It appears that “The West” (France, England and the USA), are still trying to find or make an excuse to attack Assad and his country.

I am not sure if this is more to help save the Islamic terrorist still fighting in a few areas of Syria, or that they want to remove Assad.

Reprinted from

In a statement published on Monday, the Russian MoD said it noted the deployment to the Mediterranean last weekend of the missile destroyer USS Ross carrying 28 Tomahawk cruise missiles on board. It came after a similar move of the USS The Sullivans to the Persian Gulf and the rebasing of a B-1B Lancer strategic bomber to an air base in Qatar, RT reported.

The Russian defence ministry added that the “preparations are the latest evidence of the US intention to use the” expected provocation.

The statement reiterated that the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham militant group, previously known as Al-Nusra Front, was preparing a staged chlorine attack in a city in Idlib. It alleged that a group of militants, trained in the handling of chemical weapons by the British private military contractor Olive Group, has already arrived in Jisr al-Shughur. The group will “stage decontamination of victims of a staged chemical weapons attack posing as members of the notorious White Helmets group,” the defence ministry claimed.

“The implementation of this provocation, which is being conducted with the assistance of the British intelligence services, is meant to serve as the latest pretext for the US, Britain and France to deliver a missile strike against state and economic facilities in Syria,” Defense Ministry Spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov stressed.

“The United States keeps building up the group of cruise missile carriers in the Middle East region, connected with the preparation of a regular provocation with alleged ‘use of chemical weapons’ in the province of Idlib,” Konashenkov stated, according to Sputnik.

According to the Russian Defense Ministry, US destroyer may strike any part of Syria from the Mediterranean.

The Russian Defense Ministry stated on Sunday that “foreign specialists” arrived in Syria to stage a chemical attack using chlorine, warning that the staging of the incident may happen in two days.

Konashenkov said on Sunday the operation is planned to unfold in Kafr Zita village in Syria’s Northwestern Hama Province, adding that the foreign “English-speaking specialists” are planning to stage an attack using “poisonous agents” in the “next two days”.

Konashenkov stressed that a group of residents from the North has been transported to Kafr Zita and is currently being prepared “to take part in the staging of the attack” and be seen suffering from “’supposedly chemical munitions’ and ‘barrel bombs’ launched by the Syrian government forces”.

Also on Saturday, the Russian Defense Ministry accused the United States, the United Kingdom and France of preparing to carry out new strikes against Syria under the pretext of chemical weapons use by the Syrian government forces.

According to the spokesman, militants in the Idlib province are preparing to stage the use of chemical weapons against civilians by the government.

On the occasion of the fifth anniversary of a 2013 chemical weapons attack in Syria’s Eastern Ghouta, the United Kingdom, the United States and France released a statement warning that they “will respond appropriately to any further use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime”. The statement also called on supporters of Syrian President Bashar Assad to “use their influence to uphold the global norm against chemical weapons use”.

The first Western missile attack on Syrian government forces was conducted by the United States on April 2017 after Washington had accused Damascus of being behind the alleged chemical weapons use in the settlement of Khan Sheikhoun in the Idlib province.

The US, UK, and France coordinated a massive airstrike on Syria in April 2018 after the alleged use of the chemical weapons in Douma in Eastern Damascus had been reported by the controversial “White Helmets” NGO, which has repeatedly been caught staging false flag attacks. OPCW experts announced in July they had found traces of organic substances containing chlorine, reportedly used in the attack in Eastern Ghouta.

Damascus has strongly denied the claims, with the Syrian President saying that the attack was a provocation aimed to justify the US strike on Syria.


See also:

Macron: France Ready to Conduct New Strikes on Syria if Chemical Weapons Used.

Or listen to Trunews.

Chemical weapons attack on children

This week the world has been outraged and rightly so at a chemical attack on children.

(At times like this the world calls them innocent children, though any parent or theologian knows that there is evil lurking there in their hearts. This is just me being a pedant, to all intense they are innocent in that they do not deserve us to kill hem horribly with burning chemicals.)

I am not really sure that chemical attacks on an adult are much less bad, I do not want to die while choking up me bleeding lungs. But let’s assume that killing babies by burning them with chemicals is bad.

Here in the UK and widely across the world, we regularly and legally kill babies with chemicals every day. If this was brought to your attention on the BBC or on CNN and if there where videos of the suffering children there would be an outcry. But these babies are poisoned and killed in what should be the safest place on earth. Within the mother’s womb.

If this was brought to your attention on the BBC or on CNN and if there where videos of the suffering children there would be an outcry. But these babies are poisoned and killed in what should be the safest place on earth. Within the mother’s womb. So no oxygen masks, no rushing them to the hospital in the arms of their parents, No crying – at least no crying that you can hear. Just an agonising death in the dark. Eyes, and lungs and skin burning, and no relief. No one here will wash your skin or eyes with fresh water.

Most abortion actually involves the baby being dismembered by a powerful suction tube with a sharp cutting edge is inserted into the womb through the dilated cervix. Then the blood, amniotic fluid, placental tissue, and baby body parts are sucked into a collection bottle. Others are starved by chemicals that stop the mother feeding the child.

Salt Poisoning

However, many children are being killed by saline amniocentesis. This technique is used after 16 weeks of pregnancy when enough fluid has accumulated in the amniotic fluid sac surrounding the baby.

A needle is inserted through the mother’s abdomen and 50-250 ml (as much as a cup) of amniotic fluid is withdrawn and replaced with a solution of concentrated salt. The baby breathes in, swallowing the salt, and is poisoned. The chemical solution also causes painful burning and deterioration of the baby’s skin. Usually, after about an hour, the child dies. The mother goes into labour about 33 to 35 hours after installation and delivers a dead, burned, and shrivelled baby. About 97% of mothers deliver their dead babies within 72 hours.

Killing children in a chemical attack is just wrong. Whether in Syria or the womb.

If you have killed your baby, and are now feeling bad, there is an answer. There is forgiveness in Jesus. Contact me for a copy of Finding Gid’s Way.

One of the best Pro-life speeches EVER! Gianna Jessen abortion survivor.



Assad in the cross hairs.

Danger, danger over Syria!

I am VERY concerned!

It appears that “they” have succeeded in turning Trump, and have all but succeded in plunging the world into war. If not war, the takedown of Assad and a VERY heightened risk of war with Russia.


The gas attack before this most recent attack, the Ghouta chemical/gas attack of 2013, was a ‘false flag’ intended to give Barak Obama a reason to invade Syria.

Seymour Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libya’s Sarin to Syrian Rebels. The great investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, in two previous articles in the London Review of Books («Whose Sarin?» and «The Red Line and the Rat Line») has reported that the Obama Administration falsely blamed the government of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad for the sarin gas attack that Obama was trying to use as an excuse to invade Syria; and Hersh pointed to a report from British intelligence saying that the sarin that was used didn’t come from Assad’s stockpiles. Hersh also said that a secret agreement in 2012 was reached between the Obama Administration and the leaders of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, to set up a sarin gas attack and blame it on Assad so that the US could invade and overthrow Assad. «By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria». from

If you want more on this see this YouTube video.

It was only the fact that the Russians said, over our dead bodies are you going to depose Assad and take Syria that they backed down.

The gas attack this week.

Almost without a doubt, this last gas attack was also… not Assad. Why would he get up in the morning and say, “Hey, the world is coming to terms with me leading Syria, I better prove to them I am a mad man and get them to attack me and probably kill me.” It just does not make sense.

I do not yet have independent evidence to say if it was the Assad’s attack on a weapons store that released rebel gas, or if it was a CIA or the like who released the gas after the attack to provide the excuse for an invasion. Either way, they will not let this opportunity to take control of Syria go without an all out effort to depose Assad and carve up Syria.

Either way, most, of not all of my analyst friends believe that it was not Assad.

In the recent gas attack, a few dozens of people died. They died horribly and it is an utter tragedy. A wicked crime. But before we kill Assad and many tens of thousands of his troops and civilians in an attack on Syria. You must be sure that it is just.

First, ask yourself some questions.

  • Do we yet KNOW it was Assad? (NO – even the left-leaning establishment media is still talking about the alleged attack by Assad). That will not stop people blaming Assad, nor the UN taking action against him.
  • Who is ultimately responsible for the war in which this ‘attack’ is just one event?
  • Assad is the 19th and current President of Syria. Legitimate President even if we do not like him.
  • His country is under attack. He is defending it.
  • There are military operations in his country, and against the legitimate government from many many nations. Including Israel, America, and the UK. Though the majority of the fighters are non-Syrian radical Muslims supported by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar.
  • This war is in Assad’s country and against his government. He is not attacking other countries, he is defending his.
  • The rebel fighters are hiding in amongst the civilian population so that it is very hard to fight them without killing civilians. I think this is actually a war crime is it not? No outcry about that. No, “We must stop these evil war criminal rebels,” because they are serving our agenda.
  • Another question you could try is, “why are the almost 1,000 civilian non-combatant deaths across Iraq and Syria in March by coalition forces ok, but these few dozens are a war crime?” see the Independent article here.

I am by no means saying that Assad is a good man or even that he should be the president of Syria. But that to blame him for defending his country is a bit off.

Remove the rebel fighters for a year. Remove sanctions and help the country to rebuild and then see if he is still killing people.

Trump now talking about getting involved in Syria.

Now it appears that they have managed to force Trump’s hand into taking action against Assad.

I do not know if it is from the continuous illegal surveillance of Trump and some dirt they have threatened him with, or whether he has been hoodwinked into believing that it truly was Assad. But we can certainly see that using the ‘Bad Russia,’ ‘fake news,’ about Russia hacking the USelectionss, they have left no room for Trump to be seen as soft or friendly towards the Russia supported Assad regime.

Russia stopped the slaughter known as the Arab Spring, it looks like the elite are doing everything they can do to get it going again.

We could also talk about the huge NATO buildup on the border or Russia, but for now, I do not have time to get into this.

Did Assad gass his own people?

Today, the world is condemning Bashar al-Assad for, ‘gassing innocent civilians.’

Even though most people are clearly saying that as yet there is no way to tell who is responsible for this attack.


Let us lay out some background.

  • Bashar al-Assad has had all his chemical weapons removed.
  • Assad is just beginning to get over the ‘evil-doer’ image that he has been in for the last few years and is being. Governments that has been calling for his overthrow are now talking about negotiating with him.
  • With the help of Russia, Bashar al-Assad is winning the war against the insurgents, right across his country.

So, Assad is winning the war, beginning to become more accepted by the world, (so it would appear). Just what motive would Assad have to stir up worldwide hatred of himself and his government?

Israel at least is now wanting to “destroy Siria’s airforce”.

I can not see any motivation for Assad, nothing that he could gain from this attack.

Who else might benefit?

There has been a concerted effort to stir up hatred of Russia for months or even years.

For example, “Russia hacked the US elections.” which is not even what is being claimed but is a rhetorical statement. But even the claims that are being made appear to have NO evidence, only unsupported accusations.

The last six months or so of psyops against Trump has left it almost impossible for him to stand in support of Assad because Russia is supporting Assad.

If Israel or others under some UN agreement, attack Assad, they will be by implications, maybe fact attacking Russia.

It appears to me that it is very possible that one of the many groups who has been pushing for war with Russia have a lot more to gain than Assad.